IT IS A GOOD FEELING TO BE HEARD

I learned over two years ago the New York State Unified Court System revised the custody and visitation petitions to the extent that it gives the trier of fact information that determines the the paternity of the child. How does this affect a case?

Now the trier-of-fact is aware of the marital status of both parties, the familial breakdown on both sides between both litigants before application and analysis.

You have no idea how many children that will save from the suffering my child and my family have suffered before this change was made. Thank you for making this change to adjudicate cases in the "Childrens' Courts" throughout the Entire New York State Unified Court System.

An impactful implication for live cases:

The Abuse of process.
The Application and Analysis of the "Best Interests of the Child"
Dereliction of duty and a Malicious Law Guardian and the "Best Interests of the Child"
The overt commission of malfeasance
The overt activity of judicial misconduct
The Pro Se Litigant and the Denial of Access to Justice in the Courts.

Before this change was made a litigant could deny paternity to the child and admit paternity of a child all in one court between the same parties regarding the same child.

I have no idea who instituted the change system-wide, but thank you for taking steps to insuring the "Best Interests of Children" are met when adjudicating cases for children in the family courts, that is a giant step in the right direction in any and all New York Family Courts throughout the entire New York State Unified Court System. Now lets see inconsistent Rulings in the custody/visitation and support parts Stop between the same litigants in the same court regarding the same child! "HE WHO SEEKS EQUITY MUST DO EQUITY".

But what do we do for the cases actively operating while in error and the complications made from those errors?